USPTO serial 75643218
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
PLZ 9 900 RTE 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | HOUSEHOLD SPONGES, SCRUB BRUSHES, CLEANING BRUSHES FOR THE TOILET AND SHOWER, EXFOLIATOR BRUSHES, TRASH CANS, DRINKING GLASSES, TOOTHBRUSH HOLDERS, FACIAL TISSUE HOLDERS, BATHROOM TISSUE HOLDERS AND SOAP DISHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BEDSPREADS, BLANKETS, SHEETS, COTTON PLACE MATS, COTTON TABLECLOTHS, DISHCLOTHS, WASHCLOTHS, TOWELS, OVEN MITTS, POT HOLDERS, AND SHOWER CURTAINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | floor mats for vehicles, textile floor mats for use in the home, rugs, and rubber tub mats | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |