USPTO serial 75643324
NORTHLAND ORGANIC FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NORTHLAND ORGANIC FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jana L. France
JANA L FRANCE FISH & RICHARDSON, PC3300 DAIN RAUSCHER PLZ60 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Brokerage in the field of oils, agricultural seeds, and unprocessed grains | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |