USPTO serial 75643981
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID B. BERNSTEIN
CHRISTINE M BAKER ESQ MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY & POPEO666 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | CONTRACT RESEARCH, MEDICAL MARKETING AND CONSULTING SERVICES FOR INTERNATIONAL PHARMACEUTICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL DEVICE AND DIAGNOSTICS ORGANIZATIONS; CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOTECHNOLOGY PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, CLINICAL TRIAL MANAGEMENT, CLINICAL DATA MANAGEMENT, BIOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS, CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, REGISTRATION, MEDICAL MARKETING AND MEDICAL IMAGING; CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO REGULATORY AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION; CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE MANAGEMENT AND CONDUCT OF CLINICAL TRIALS; REGULATORY AND MEDICAL CONSULTING; PRODUCT LAUNCH SERVICES, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, RELATING TO PHARMACEUTICALS AND HEALTH CARE; CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT MANUFACTURING; CONSULTING SERVICES ON INTERNATIONAL PHARMACEUTICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL DEVICE AND DIAGNOSTICS ORGANIZATION INDUSTRY TRAINING AND PUBLISHING | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |