USPTO serial 75644344
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
MEYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES LIMITED
KOWLOON, HK
Other trademarks owned by MEYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES LIMITED
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dean Luca Krause
Dean Luca Krause c/o Meyer Corporation, U.S.1 MEYER PLAZAMEYER CORPORATION, U.S.VALLEJO, CA 94590| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electric cooking utensils, namely, domestic and commercial knives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 23, 2003 |
| 011 | major kitchen appliances and apparatus for heating, cooking, freezing, refrigerating, drying, ventilating and washing and domestic electrical appliance, namely, gas and electric ranges, commercial and domestic cooking ovens, hoods for ranges, refrigerators, freezers, electric kettles, barbecue grills, electric kitchen appliances, namely, toasters, toaster ovens, breadmakers for domestic and commercial use, coffee makers for commercial and domestic use, pressure cookers, fryers, hot plates, roasters for domestic and commercial use, coffee percolators for domestic and commercial and griddles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 23, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |