USPTO serial 75644374
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody L. Factor
JODY L FACTOR FACTOR & PARTNERS, LLC1327 W WASHINGTON BLVD STE 5 G/HCHICAGO, IL 60607UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND TRAINING PERSONNEL IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES; CONDUCTING MARKETING STUDIES FOR OTHERS; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING SERVICES; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CORPORATE MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TRAINING OF PERSONNEL OF OTHERS; OPERATION OF EMPLOYEE/CORPORATE TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR OTHERS; PRODUCTION OF AUDIO-VISUAL RECORDING SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE PRODUCTION SERVICES; CUSTOM DESIGN OF BUSINESS AND/OR CORPORATE TRAINING PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SERVICES; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |