USPTO serial 75644731
RR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2003
- Examiner
- KANG, JANE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTREAL, CA
MONTREAL, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC H4R 2H4, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC H4R 2H4, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC H4R 2H4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jenny R. Splitter
Jenny R. Splitter Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP1101 30th Street NW, Suite 120Washington, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | PANTS, SHIRTS, SWEATERS, AND TIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JACK VICTOR LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by JACK VICTOR LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BARMISH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BARMISH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BARMISH INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RR
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 1, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |