USPTO serial 75644888
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID R MARTINEZ
DAVID R MARTINEZ DAVID R MARTINEZ PC2900 CHAMBLEE TUCKER RD BLDG 6ATLANTA, GA 30341UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORES FEATURING CLOTHING, MUSIC DISKS, MUSIC TAPES, AND SHOES | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |