Drawing for ICE INSIGHT INTO CATEGORY EXCELLENCE

USPTO serial 75644997

ICE INSIGHT INTO CATEGORY EXCELLENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICE INSIGHT INTO CATEGORY EXCELLENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLIE K MITCHELL

LESLIE K MITCHELL FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MARKETING SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING A SALES PROGRAM FOR RETAILERS INTENDED TO PROMOTE THE PURCHASE OF CONFECTIONERY PRODUCTS BY INDIVIDUALSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 23, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 29, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Oct 3, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 26, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance