Drawing for QUANTUMLYNX

USPTO serial 75646360

QUANTUMLYNX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUANTUMLYNX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DOROTHY C. ALEVIZATOS

DOROTHY C ALEVIZATOS HUNTON & WILLIAMS200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166-0136UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation; providing statistical information on consumers and providers that is comprised of services preferences, billing information, business metrics associated with the access; computerized database management of information featuring data of activities of either consumer or providerACTIVE
042Computer consultation for information providers; computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites and applications for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 14, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 20, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 13, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 13, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 6, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 5, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 1, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 1, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 10, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance