USPTO serial 75647498
CPMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CPMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | certifying that authorized users have met applicant's standards for demonstrated knowledge and experience in the field of promoting the goods and/or services of others by use of sweepstakes, games, contests, promotional product sample offers, coupons, and/or other forms of advertising programs | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |