USPTO serial 75647703
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A. SEBOLT
JOSEPH A SEBOLT SAND & SEBOLTASTON PARK PROFESSIONAL CTR STE 1944801 DRESSIER RD N WCANTON, OH 44718| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | EARTH BORERS AND DIRECTIONAL DRILLS FOR DRILLING EARTH; TRACKS AND CONTROLLERS FOR MOVING EARTH BORER AND DIRECTIONAL DRILL TOWARD AND AWAY FROM A DRILL SITE | ACTIVE | Jan 14, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |