USPTO serial 75648641
HEARME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEARME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW P BRIDGES
J ALLISON STRICKLAND FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software that enables users to access electronic media, namely, global computer networks, wide area networks and local area networks, for communicating voice and text, for viewing and listening to on-line entertainment programs, and viewing advertisements | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, CONSUMER ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS AND ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TOYS, GAMES, ELECTRONIC GAMES, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE, AND AUDIO/VIDEO/MULTIMEDIA RECORDINGS; ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, PREPARING BANNER ADVERTISEMENTS AND CREATING COMPUTER SPLASH SCREENS FOR OTHERS, DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATTER, PROMOTING SPORTS COMPETITIONS FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER GAMING TOURNAMENTS AND EVENTS OF OTHERS, ALL BY MEANS OF GLOBAL COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, WIDE AREA NETWORKS AND LOCAL AREA NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |