USPTO serial 75649010
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Serritella
JOSEPH J SERRITELLA PEPPER HAMILTON LLPEIGHTEENTH AND ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MAGNETICALLY CODED AND ELECTRICALLY ENCODED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARDS, OR SMART CARDS, CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED TO IMPLEMENT BANKING AND CREDIT, DEBIT AND STORED VALUE CARD SERVICES, ELECTRONIC CASH TRANSACTIONS, ELECTRONIC CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS, AND ELECTRONIC DEBIT TRANSACTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PROMOTING THE SALE OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY AWARDING DISCOUNTS AND PURCHASE POINTS FOR CREDIT CARD USE AND THROUGH THE ADMINISTRATION OF INCENTIVE AWARD PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | BANKING SERVICES, NAMELY, BANKING AND CREDIT, DEBIT AND STORED VALUE CARD SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |