Drawing for VERSAPAY

USPTO serial 75649010

VERSAPAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENZMILLER, ANDREW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERSAPAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph J. Serritella

JOSEPH J SERRITELLA PEPPER HAMILTON LLPEIGHTEENTH AND ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MAGNETICALLY CODED AND ELECTRICALLY ENCODED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARDS, OR SMART CARDS, CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED TO IMPLEMENT BANKING AND CREDIT, DEBIT AND STORED VALUE CARD SERVICES, ELECTRONIC CASH TRANSACTIONS, ELECTRONIC CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS, AND ELECTRONIC DEBIT TRANSACTIONSACTIVE
035PROMOTING THE SALE OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY AWARDING DISCOUNTS AND PURCHASE POINTS FOR CREDIT CARD USE AND THROUGH THE ADMINISTRATION OF INCENTIVE AWARD PROGRAMSACTIVE
036BANKING SERVICES, NAMELY, BANKING AND CREDIT, DEBIT AND STORED VALUE CARD SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 18, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 18, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 18, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 27, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Feb 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 26, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 26, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance