USPTO serial 75653527
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
80469 Munich, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALEEN ROTHSCHILD-SEIDEL
ALEEN ROTHSCHILD-SEIDEL LAW OFFICE OF ALEEN ROTHSCHILD SEIDEL3201 NEW MEXICO AVE NW STE 350WASHINGTON, DC 20016-2756UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER DATA PROCESSING PROGRAMS FOR FORM-BASED DIGITAL DATA TRANSFER INTERFACE BETWEEN USERS AND DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS WHICH ARE BASED ON TCP/IP PROTOCOL | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Instructional and teaching material (except apparatus), in particular, instructional software to teach the basis of the information architecture of the internet or of systems similar to the internet, as well as software and documents for the purpose of learning how to program in page and form description languages, and similar matters | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications, in particular, fax services in connection with the internet, services to process electronic mail, as well as services to store and manage documents and programs on the internet or in systems similar to the internet, and similar matters | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY FORM-BASED DIGITAL DATA TRANSFER INTERFACE BETWEEN USERS AND DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM WHICH ARE BASED ON TCP/IP PROTOCOLS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |