USPTO serial 75660252
WINTERIZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINTERIZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melville Owen,
MELVILLE OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST 19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | LAWN FERTILIZER FOR AGRICULTURAL AND DOMESTIC USE; COMBINATION OF LAWN FERTILIZER AND HERBICIDE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND DOMESTIC USE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |