USPTO serial 75664522
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Serritella
JOSEPH J SERRITELLA EIGHTEENTH AND ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MAGNETICALLY ENCODED AND MICROPROCESSOR-BASED CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED TO IMPLEMENT BANKING SERVICES, NAMELY, BANKING AND CREDIT, DEBIT AND STORED VALUE CARD AND ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SERVICES | ACTIVE | Nov 17, 1998 |
| 036 | BANKING SERVICES, NAMELY, BANKING AND CREDIT, DEBIT AND STORED VALUE CARD AND ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SERVICES THAT PROMOTE THE PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION PROVIDED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION PROVIDED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Nov 17, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |