Drawing for MILLENNIUM FALCON

USPTO serial 75665247

MILLENNIUM FALCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLENNIUM FALCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TADIANA W. JONES

TADIANA W JONES DURHAM JONES & PINEGAR111 E BROADWAY STE 900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012General Aviation and Aerobatic Airplanes - Namely-- Fixed Wing, Single Engine, Pressurized AircraftACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Mar 9, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Nov 17, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2003LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST
Jun 26, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 14, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 20, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 21, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 21, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance