USPTO serial 75665468
SECUREFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECUREFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
64646 Heppenheim, DE
64646 Heppenheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay K. Meadway
JAY K MEADWAY BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic, magnetic, electromagnetic and high frequency article surveillance systems used as shoplifting prevention devices, comprising magnetic wire strips, magnetic wire security elements for electronic, magnetic and electromagnetic and high frequency article surveillance systems, namely radio frequency circuits and magnetic wires or films | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper and cardboard labels and tags for electronic, magnetic, electromagnetic and high frequency article surveillance systems, plastic, paper and cardboard wrapping | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Labels and tags made from plastic for electronic, magnetic and high frequency article surveillance systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Meto International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Meto International GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named SECUREFLEX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |