USPTO serial 75665901
PERMAGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERMAGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN C WERNER JR
STEPHEN C WERNER JR WHYTE HIRSCHBOECK DUDEK SC111 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4894UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Coating in the nature of a color stain and protective finish applied to wood doors during the factory-finishing process | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |