USPTO serial 75666287
D'ARTAGNAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2847619Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 1, 2004
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with D'ARTAGNAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hicksville, NY
Hicksville, NY
NEWARK, NJ
NEWARK, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Rosen
Robert B. Rosen Hellring, Lindeman, Goldstein & Siegal, LLCOne Gateway Center8th FloorNewark, NJ 07102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Flatware made of plastic or stainless steel, namely, knives, forks, spoons and cutlery, namely, kitchen knives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 21, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Excel Importing Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Excel Importing Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by D' ARTAGNAN TRADEMARKS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by D' ARTAGNAN TRADEMARKS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named D'ARTAGNAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 17, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |