Drawing for BABY SAFE

USPTO serial 75667010

BABY SAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BABY SAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason M. Drangel

JASON M DRANGEL BAZERMAN & DRANGEL PC60 E 42ND ST STE 1158NEW YORK, NY 10165-1199UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic non-medicated bath, shower and skin care products, namely, creams for the skin, hands, face and body; lotions for the skin, hands, face and body; pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes; non-medicated skin soaps; disinfectant soaps; oils for the skin, hands, face, body and bath; skin creams to bleach the skin; essential oils for personal use; lotions, shampoos and conditioners for the hair, toothpastes; perfume for men and womenACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 25, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 20, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 24, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 16, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 14, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 3, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 16, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance