Drawing for SINGLE SOURCE

USPTO serial 75670396

SINGLE SOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SINGLE SOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75201-4761UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing extended warranty contracts on metal roofs and wallsACTIVEJan 31, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 17, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 29, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 29, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Dec 16, 2003NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Nov 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 30, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 30, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 24, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 3, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance