USPTO serial 75670482
WIRELESS ASSISTED GPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2610789Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2002
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WIRELESS ASSISTED GPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Christopher Norton, Esq.
N. Christopher Norton, Esq. Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Ave., NWWashington, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | global positioning systems hardware and software, namely, global positioning circuits, hand-held receivers, mobile receivers, ground station receivers, satellites, base station systems in the nature of computer servers and relays, network of reference global positioning receivers, operating software for use therewith, and global positioning software in the nature of navigation, location, tracking, mapping and timing software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 1999 |
| 038 | communications services and telecommunications services namely, using global positioning systems to provide for navigation, location, tracking, mapping and timing objectives for users; providing the electronic transmission of data; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; electronic transmission of voice messages and data by telephone or network communications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 8, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 23, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |