USPTO serial 75671976
BLUEMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUEMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Nylon hoses and metal fittings for heating, ventilating, air conditioning and refrigeration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 19, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 1, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |