USPTO serial 75676096
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
REDWOOD CITY, CA
DARTMOUTH, NOVA SCOTIA B3B 1L6, CA
DARTMOUTH, NOVA SCOTIA B3B 1L6, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES E. BAXLEY, ESQ
CHARLES E BAXLEY ESQ HART, BAXLEY, DANIELS & HOLTON59 JOHN ST FIFTH FLNEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer network management consultation services in the data-over cable industry, namely providing monitoring of on-call response to outages, server management and technical planning and forecasting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 15, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |