USPTO serial 75676744
SHADY LADY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2989864Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2005
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHADY LADY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GRANBY, CT
Moncks Corner, SC
Moncks Corner, SC
Moncks Corner, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest B. Lipscomb, III
ERNEST B LIPSCOMB III ALSTON & BIRD LLPPOST OFFICE DRAWER 34009CHARLOTTE, NC 28234UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Live ornamental plants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 8, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NOVALIS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Carolina Nurseries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Carolina Nurseries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Carolina Nurseries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named SHADY LADY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |