USPTO serial 75677384
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWERENCE E. APOLZON
LAWERENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRAM & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PHARMACEUTICALS, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC BIOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS, ALL USED IN THE DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND MONITORING OF CANCER, INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND OTHER CHRONIC DISEASES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC BIOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS FOR CLINICAL MEDICAL LABORATORY USE, NAMELY, FOR THE DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND MONITORING OF CANCER AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | MEDICAL RESEARCH AND TESTING SERVICES IN THE AREAS OF PHARMACY, CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY, ALL DIRECTED TO THE DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND MONITORING OF CANCER, INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND OTHER CHRONIC DISEASES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |