USPTO serial 75677938
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEANNE H OZAKI
DEANNE H OZAKI PAUL HASTINGS JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP555 S FLOWER ST 23RD FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business and business management consultation and planning; business management; and employment counseling and recruitment | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1992 |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware; and installation of computer systems | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1992 |
| 041 | computer education training services; educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars and workshops in the fields of computer software, project management, business management, and communications | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1992 |
| 042 | technical support services, namely, the installation and maintenance of computer software; integration of computer systems and networks; computer consultation; technical consultation in the field of information technology; product development for others in the fields of computer systems, computer networks and computer software | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |