USPTO serial 75678285
FDF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FDF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George J. Paukert
GEORGE J PAUKERT LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE J. PAUKERT737 S WINDSOR BLVD STE 304LOS ANGELES, CA 90005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BODY AND SKIN SOAP, BODY AND SKIN LIQUID GEL SOAP, BODY AND SKIN MOISTURIZER, HAIR SHAMPOO AND HAIR CONDITIONER, BATH SALTS, PERFUME, AND AROMATHERAPY BODY AND SKIN MASSAGE OILS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 11, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 11, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |