USPTO serial 75679104
ECARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles L. Warner II
CHARLES L WARNER II TROUTMAN SANDERS LLPBANK OF AMERICA PLZ600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for enabling, managing, storing, relating, organizing, directing, automating, coordinating, scheduling, consolidating, providing graphical user interfaces for, and controlling, tasks, business processes, transactions, applications, and information, such as voice, video, data, facsimile, e-mail, mixed media items, multiple media items, communications, databases, documents, messages, images, scanned photographs, scanned documents, contact information, customer information, agent information, files, and case histories, among mainframes, servers, agent terminals, consumer access devices, agents, and consumers via local, national and global information and communication networks, for use in the field of customer interaction management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |