USPTO serial 75679802
SMARTMODULE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2700689Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2003
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTMODULE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Luterbach 4542, CH
Luterbach 4542, CH
Luterbach 4542, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
S. Roxanne Edwards
S. Roxanne Edwards Baker & McKenzie LLP2300 Trammell Crow Center2001 Ross AvenueDallas, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, namely, miniaturized PC systems that are installed in electronic systems functioning as control electronics and/or data processing electronics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |