USPTO serial 75681868
DIRT BAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIRT BAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Manhattan Beach, CA
MILANO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micol Cecchi
MICOL CECCHI STOKES BARTHOLOMEW EVANS & PETREE PA424 CHURCH ST STE 2800NASHVILLE, TN 37219UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |