Drawing for THE LIBRARY CARD

USPTO serial 75685157

THE LIBRARY CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BADAGLIACCA, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LIBRARY CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay H. Geller

JAY H GELLERW TWR STE 40002425 W OLYMPIC BLSANTA MONICA, CA 90404

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Magnetically encoded discount cards that entitle the holder to discounts on the purchase of books, periodicals, music, tickets to special events, motion picture tickets, video rentals, travel, gasoline and other fuels, copying and related services, clothes, sporting goods, banking and financial services, communications devices and services, food, lodging and all other types of consumer goods and servicesACTIVE
016Non-magnetically encoded discount cards that entitle the holder to discounts on the purchase of books, periodicals, music, tickets to special events, motion picture tickets, video rentals, travel, gasoline and other fuels, copying and related services, clothes, sporting goods, banking and financial services, communications devices and services, food, lodging and all other types of consumer goods and servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 5, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 28, 2000DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 25, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 16, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 22, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 23, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance