Drawing for BLAME GAME

USPTO serial 75685222

BLAME GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLAME GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SELENE H COSTELLO

SELENE H COSTELLO MTV NETWORKS1515 BROADWAY 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video game machines for use with television; audio output game machines for use with television; hand held video game cartridges; game machines utilizing CD-ROM's; game cartridges for computer video games and video output game machines and instructional materials sold as a unit; computer game cassettes; computer game tapes and manuals sold as a unit; theatrical and musical sound recordings; theatrical and musical video recordings; and sunglassesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 3, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 15, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 3, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 3, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 3, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 3, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 5, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 16, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance