USPTO serial 75686044
T LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2002
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with T LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Greenville, SC
Greenville, SC
DUNLOP SLAZENGER GROUP LIMITED
BURNHAM, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE SL1 8DF, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELIZABETH D CHRISTIAN
EDWARD CHARBONNEAU ESQ DUNLOP SPORTS GROUP AMERICAS INC25 DRAPER STGREENVILLE, SC 29611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | GOLF CLUBS, NAMELY, PUTTERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 16, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |