Drawing for RAPIDFORM

USPTO serial 75687633

RAPIDFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAPIDFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELIZABETH V. CARDOZA

ELIZABETH V CARDOZA CARDOZA LAW ASSOCIATES41299 PASEO PADRE PKWY #7FREMONT, CA 94539UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded computer programs and operating software for 3D reconstruction, modeling, editing and measuring of architectural models and document data transfer and physical conversion of data from one media to anotherACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 26, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 23, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2000ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance