USPTO serial 75688198
VALUEQUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VALUEQUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee A. Zaleski
AIMEE A ZALESKI PORTER, WRIGHT, MORRIS & ARTHUR41 S HIGH STCOLUMBUS, OH 43215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing business services to the telecommunications businesses, including industry best practices analysis; providing business information in the field of business acquisitions, namely, a listing buy/sell candidates in the telecommunications industry; computer services, namely, providing an online electronic database on global computer networks, namely, a listing of buy/sell candidates in the telecommunications industry | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1999 |
| 036 | providing financial services to the telecommunications industry, namely valuation of telecommunications businesses and assets | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |