USPTO serial 75694592
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3S 1B3, CA
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3S 1B3, CA
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3S 1B3, CA
REDWOOD CITY, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mr. Charles E. Baxley
Anne H. Peck Cooley Godward Kronish LLPFive Palo Alto Square3000 El Camino RealPalo Alto, CA 94306| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO ENABLE CABLE OPERATORS TO MANAGE DATA COMMUNICATION SUBSCRIBERS IN THE FIELDS OF CONTACT MANAGEMENT, ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT, PACKAGES AND SERVICES MANAGEMENT, POINT OF PRESENCE MANAGEMENT, REMOTE SERVER INTEGRATION, TROUBLE TICKETING, SYSTEM USER MANAGEMENT, ASSET TRACKING, IP/DHCP ADDRESS MANAGEMENT, SNMP MONITORING, NOTICE BOARDS, NETWORK WEATHER REPORTS AND DOCSIS CONFIGURATION FILE GENERATION | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |