Drawing for NETCARD

USPTO serial 75694757

NETCARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETCARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHERYLE WIEDMEIER GERING

CHERYLE WIEDMEIER GERING DAVENPORT EVANS HURWITZ & SMITH LLPP O BOX 1030SIOUX FALLS, SD 57101-1030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game discs, computer game cd-roms, and computer game programsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2005ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
May 4, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Mar 8, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Mar 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 22, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 9, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 9, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 9, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 9, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 8, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 8, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 7, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 7, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 9, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance