Drawing for CREATOPIA

USPTO serial 75695894

CREATOPIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CREATOPIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A Smart

THOMAS A SMART KAYE SCHOLER FIERMAN HAYS & HANDLER LLP425 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-3598UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely motion picture film and video production; entertainment in the nature of an ongoing television series in the field of animated and live action comedy-drama, action adventure, and educational programming; motion picture, radio programming and television program distribution for others; production of educational and entertainment video programming intended for on-line distribution by means of a global computer network; production of television broadcast programs and interactive television programs intended for online distribution via a global computer network and for distribution via cable, satellite, wireless and traditional television in the fields of education and entertainment for childrenACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Sep 30, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Sep 30, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 4, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 3, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 3, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 26, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 4, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 4, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 4, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 4, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 13, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance