USPTO serial 75704309
THE SERVICE DIFFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2643312Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 29, 2002
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SERVICE DIFFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Worthington
8875 Hidden River Pkwy., Ste. 400Tampa, FL 33637UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPES, AUDIO TAPES AND CD-ROMS FEATURING INFORMATION ON EDUCATION, CONSULTING AND TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF CUSTOMER SERVICE; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT PERMITS THE USER TO ACCESS INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR USE IN EDUCATIONAL, CONSULTING AND TRAINING SERVICE IN THE FIELD OF CUSTOMER SERVICE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 10, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |