USPTO serial 75704767
EFOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EFOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5J 5G7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark M.J. Yang
MARK M J YANG885 W GEORGIA ST STE 800VANCOUVER, BC V6C 3H1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for conducting and analyzing online surveys, web conferencing, online community creation, namely, software that collects and distributes information to facilitate the creation of relationships between vendors and purchasers, and web site traffic measurement and analysis, in the field of market research | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Consulting on business strategy and management; consumer and industrial market research; survey research for public opinion studies; specialized research inquiries for public sector and private sector clients in both the consumer and industrial markets; specialized research services such as social, political, consumer, human resources and other related research and opinion surveys; assessing information needs, research design, establishment and allocation of research budgets, selection and supervision of research suppliers, and evaluation of research findings and their implications; enhancing client's presence in the market; measuring effectiveness of client's marketing efforts; business management research consulting, planning, assistance, and supervision; vendor and product analysis research, consulting and implementation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |