USPTO serial 75705082
NETWORK PHOTONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETWORK PHOTONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tsan Merritt-Poree
TSAN MERRITT-POREE COOLEY GODWARD LLP380 INTERLOCKEN CRESCENT, STE 900BROOMFIELD, CO 80021-8023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | fiber optic telecommunications systems, namely, optical cross-connects, optical add/drop multi-plexers, DWDM (Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing) terminals, SONET switches, SONET add/drop multi-plexers and ethernet switches incorporating DWDM, optical switching and optical filtering technologies for the transport and routing of optical telecommunication signals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |