USPTO serial 75707805
MUSCLE WEAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2856151Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2004
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MUSCLE WEAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dunlop Maxfli Sports Corporation
Greenville, SC
Dunlop Maxfli Sports Corporation
Greenville, SC
Dunlop Maxfli Sports Corporation
Greenville, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine McCroskey
EDWARD CHARBONNEAU DUNLOP SPORTS GROUP AMERICAS INC100 DUNLOP DRWESTMINSTER, SC 29693UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | SPORTING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TENNIS RACQUETS, SQUASH RACQUETS, TENNIS RACQUET STRING, SQUASH RACQUET STRING, HANDLE GRIPS FOR TENNIS AND SQUASH RACQUETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dunlop Maxfli Sports Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Dunlop Maxfli Sports Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Dunlop Maxfli Sports Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MUSCLE WEAVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |