USPTO serial 75708177
OSCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OSCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL WILSON, ESQ.
MICHAEL WILSON ESQ BAKER BOTTS LLP910 LOUISIANA STHOUSTON, TX 77002-4916UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | completion chemicals for use in oil and gas recovery, namely polymer and non-polymer based fracturing fluids, and completion fluids, including brines and additives, for new and work over well completions | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 1993 |
| 007 | devices for use in oil and gas completion, namely devices that stimulate, fracture, sand control and/or gravel pack formations, and that are used in coil tubing operations, for recovering oil and gas from the formations | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1993 |
| 042 | services in the field of oil and gas recovery, namely designing, testing and employing systems that stimulate, fracture, sand control and/or gravel pack formations and otherwise facilitate the recovery of oil and gas from these formations | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |