Drawing for BONDAGE

USPTO serial 75708312

BONDAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BONDAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clifford R. Michel

CLIFFORD R MICHEL SALANS HERTZFELD HEILBRONN CHRISTY620 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10020-2457UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial and investment banking services, namely providing information, research, and analysis concerning financial markets and securitiesACTIVE—
038Communications services, namely providing online chat rooms and bulletins boards concerning the topics of business, commerce, financial and investment banking services, financial markets, and securities; telecommunication gateway services; electronic mail services; real-time network conferencing services provided via a global communications networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 25, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 20, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 2, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 14, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 25, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 5, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance