Drawing for LATV

USPTO serial 75709713

LATV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2448497Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2001
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with LATV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam Claire Beezy, Marina Depietri, Jeffrey A. Kobulnick and Herbert P. Williams

Miriam Claire Beezy FOLEY & LARDNER LLP555 South Flower StreetSuite 3500Los Angeles, CA 90071-2411

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038television broadcasting servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2011CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Feb 11, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 23, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 7, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 28, 20068.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Aug 28, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
May 26, 20068.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED
May 26, 2006ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2003COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 31, 2003AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Jul 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 1, 2001R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Nov 28, 2000CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Nov 16, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance