USPTO serial 75710422
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PALO ALTO, CA
Los Altos, CA
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
PALO ALTO, CA
Mountain View, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Palermo
Christopher J. Palermo Hickman Palermo Truong Becker Bingham Wong LLP1 Almaden Boulevard - Floor 12San Jose, CA 95113UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR FACILITATING DELIVERY OF ELECTRONIC SAVINGS INCENTIVES, DISCOUNTS, COUPONS, AND ADVERTISING MATERIALS OF OTHERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 3, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |