USPTO serial 75711620
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLEY A. MORADIAN
LESLEY A. MORADIAN ESTEE LAUDER INC767 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skincare preparations, namely, skin care lotions and moisturizing creams | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 2, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |