USPTO serial 75715737
FIRSTINTERNETBANK.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIRSTINTERNETBANK.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven A. Gibson
STEVEN A GIBSON LIONEL SAWYER & COLLINS, LTD1700 BANK OF AMERICA PLZ300 S FOURTH STLAS VEGAS, NV 89101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services; lending services; electronic credit transactions; electronic value transfer services; on-line real time financial banking transaction services; electronic payment services, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; financial consulting services; financial information services; electronic transfer services; maintaining deposit accounts; financial planning services for others; real estate escrow services; providing credit to industrial, commercial and individual clientele; letter of credit facilitation; processing of financial transfer services for others; and financial draft issuance | ACTIVE | Oct 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |